Mark Rubin
Citée par
Citée par
Intergroup bias
M Hewstone, M Rubin, H Willis
Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1), 575-604, 2002
Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification
M Rubin, M Hewstone
Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (1), 40-62, 1998
The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice
FK Barlow, S Paolini, A Pedersen, MJ Hornsey, HRM Radke, J Harwood, ...
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (12), 1629-1643, 2012
Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures
S Paolini, J Harwood, M Rubin
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (12), 1723, 2010
Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al.
M Rubin, M Hewstone
Political Psychology 25 (6), 823-844, 2004
Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European …
S Graf, S Paolini, M Rubin
European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (6), 536-547, 2014
Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias?
RJ Crisp, M Hewstone, M Rubin
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (1), 76-89, 2001
Social class differences in social integration among students in higher education: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future research.
M Rubin
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 5 (1), 22-38, 2012
Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient
J Harwood, S Paolini, N Joyce, M Rubin, A Arroyo
British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (1), 180-189, 2011
“I am working-class”: Subjective self-definition as a missing measure of social class and socioeconomic status in higher education research
M Rubin, N Denson, S Kilpatrick, KE Matthews, T Stehlik, D Zyngier
Educational Researcher 43 (4), 196-200, 2014
Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present.
S Paolini, J Harwood, M Rubin, S Husnu, N Joyce, M Hewstone
European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (6), 548-562, 2014
A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants
M Rubin, S Paolini, RJ Crisp
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (1), 21-28, 2010
Do p values lose their meaning in exploratory analyses? It depends how you define the familywise error rate
M Rubin
Review of General Psychology 21 (3), 269-275, 2017
Immigrants’ social integration as a function of approach–avoidance orientation and problem-solving style
M Rubin, SE Watt, M Ramelli
International Journal of Intercultural Relations 36 (4), 498-505, 2012
Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
M Rubin, C Badea
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (1), 31-42, 2007
They’re all the same!... but for several different reasons: A review of the multicausal nature of perceived group variability
M Rubin, C Badea
Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (6), 367-372, 2012
Perceiving and responding to multiply categorizable individuals: Cognitive processes and affective intergroup bias
TK Vescio, M Hewstone, RJ Crisp, JM Rubin
Social identity and social cognition, 111-140, 1999
Age differences explain social class differences in students’ friendship at university: Implications for transition and retention
M Rubin, CL Wright
Higher Education 70, 427-439, 2015
Stigma of seeking psychological services: Examining college students across ten countries/regions
DL Vogel, HA Strass, PJ Heath, FR Al-Darmaki, PI Armstrong, ...
The Counseling Psychologist 45 (2), 170-192, 2017
Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and compete for higher status
M Rubin, C Badea, J Jetten
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 17 (5), 563-576, 2014
Le système ne peut pas réaliser cette opération maintenant. Veuillez réessayer plus tard.
Articles 1–20