| Assessing the validity of can‐do statements in retrospective (then‐now) self‐assessment NA Brown, DP Dewey, TL Cox Foreign Language Annals 47 (2), 261-285, 2014 | 96 | 2014 |
| Measuring written linguistic accuracy with weighted clause ratios: A question of validity NW Evans, KJ Hartshorn, TL Cox, TM De Jel Journal of Second Language Writing 24, 33-50, 2014 | 73 | 2014 |
| Future directions in assessment: Influences of standards and implications for language learning TL Cox, ME Malone, P Winke Foreign Language Annals 51 (1), 104-115, 2018 | 47 | 2018 |
| Comparing the OPI and the OPIc: The effect of test method on oral proficiency scores and student preference GL Thompson, TL Cox, N Knapp Foreign Language Annals 49 (1), 75-92, 2016 | 45 | 2016 |
| Using automatic speech recognition technology with elicited oral response testing TL Cox, RS Davies Calico Journal 29 (4), 601-618, 2012 | 45 | 2012 |
| Investigating the use of the ACTFL can-do statements in a self-assessment for student placement in an Intensive English Program MM Summers, TL Cox, BL McMurry, DP Dewey System 80, 269-287, 2019 | 36 | 2019 |
| Empirical validation of reading proficiency guidelines R Clifford, TL Cox Foreign Language Annals 46 (1), 45-61, 2013 | 34 | 2013 |
| Empirical validation of listening proficiency guidelines TL Cox, R Clifford Foreign Language Annals 47 (3), 379-403, 2014 | 23 | 2014 |
| Understanding Intermediate‐Level Speakers’ Strengths and Weaknesses: An Examination of OPIc Tests From Korean Learners of English TL Cox Foreign Language Annals 50 (1), 84-113, 2017 | 18 | 2017 |
| A validity argument to support the ACTFL Assessment of Performance Toward Proficiency in Languages (AAPPL) TL Cox, ME Malone Foreign Language Annals 51 (3), 548-574, 2018 | 13 | 2018 |
| Exploring proficiency‐based vs. performance‐based items with elicited imitation assessment TL Cox, J Bown, J Burdis Foreign Language Annals 48 (3), 350-371, 2015 | 13 | 2015 |
| Rubric rating with MFRM versus randomly distributed comparative judgment: A comparison of two approaches to second‐language writing assessment ME Sims, TL Cox, GT Eckstein, KJ Hartshorn, MP Wilcox, JM Hart Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 39 (4), 30-40, 2020 | 10 | 2020 |
| In Advanced L2 Reading Proficiency Assessments, Should the Question Language Be in the L1 or the L2?: Does It Make a Difference? TL Cox, J Bown, TR Bell Foreign language proficiency in higher education, 117-136, 2019 | 10 | 2019 |
| Pronunciation’s role in English speaking-proficiency ratings R Ma, LE Henrichsen, TL Cox, MW Tanner Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 4 (1), 73-102, 2018 | 10 | 2018 |
| A comparative discourse analysis of Spanish past narrations from the ACTFL OPI and OPIc AV Brown, TL Cox, GL Thompson Foreign Language Annals 50 (4), 793-807, 2017 | 10 | 2017 |
| Using elicited oral response testing to determine the need for an interpreter WG Eggington, T Cox Harv. Latino L. Rev. 16, 127, 2013 | 10 | 2013 |
| L1, L2, and cognitive development: Exploring relationships DP Dewey, R Clifford, T Cox To advanced proficiency and beyond: Theory and methods for developing …, 2015 | 7 | 2015 |
| The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency across different proficiency levels and L1s T Cox, W Baker-Smemoe Presentation at Workshop Fluent Speech (Utrecht University, The Netherlands), 2012 | 6 | 2012 |
| Line, please? An analysis of the rehearsed speech characteristics of native Korean speakers on the English Oral Proficiency Interview—Computer (OPIc) G Gates, TL Cox, TR Bell, W Eggington Language Testing in Asia 10, 1-20, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
| Constructing a Russian Elicited Imitation Exam T Cox, J Bown, J Burdis Russian Language Journal/Русский язык 66, 51-88, 2016 | 4 | 2016 |
Dan P. DeweyProfessor of Linguistics, Brigham Young UniversityVerified email at byu.edu
