| Democracy isn't that smart (but we can make it smarter): on Landemore's democratic reason A Ancell Episteme 14 (2), 161-175, 2017 | 36 | 2017 |
| How to allow conscientious objection in medicine while protecting patient rights A Ancell, W Sinnott-Armstrong Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 26 (1), 120-131, 2017 | 27 | 2017 |
| Empiricism and normative ethics: What do the biology and the psychology of morality have to do with ethics? O Flanagan, A Ancell, S Martin, G Steenbergen Behaviour 151 (2-3), 209-228, 2014 | 24 | 2014 |
| The fact of unreasonable pluralism A Ancell Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (4), 410-428, 2019 | 17 | 2019 |
| Political irrationality, utopianism, and democratic theory A Ancell Politics, Philosophy & Economics 19 (1), 3-21, 2020 | 7 | 2020 |
| Democratic theory for a market democracy: The problem of merriment and diversion when regulators and the regulated meet W Norman, A Ancell Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (4), 536-563, 2018 | 6 | 2018 |
| Public Unreason: Essays on Political Disagreement AJ Ancell Duke University, 2017 | 6 | 2017 |
| A tale of two processes: categorization accuracy and attentional learning dissociate with imperfect feedback C McColeman, A Ancell, M Blair Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 33 (33), 2011 | 5 | 2011 |
| Bias, Safeguards, and the Limits of Individuals A Ancell Business Ethics Journal Review 10 (5), 27–32, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card AJ Ancell, W Sinnott-Armstrong Journal of medical ethics 45 (8), 560-561, 2019 | 1 | 2019 |
| Compelled Speech at Work: Employer Mobilization as a Threat to Employee Speech Rights A Ancell Philosophy of Management, 1-17, 2024 | | 2024 |
| Corporate Counterspeech A Ancell Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (4), 611-625, 2023 | | 2023 |
| Liberalism A Ancell Truth and Governance, 193-215, 2021 | | 2021 |
Walter Sinnott-ArmstrongDuke UniversityVerified email at duke.edu
