Volgen
Robert Jan de Boer
Robert Jan de Boer
SDO Hogeschool
Geverifieerd e-mailadres voor xs4all.nl
Titel
Geciteerd door
Geciteerd door
Jaar
Models of automation surprise: Results of a field survey in aviation
R De Boer, S Dekker
Safety 3 (3), 20, 2017
362017
How does aviation industry measure safety performance? Current practice and limitations
S Kaspers, N Karanikas, A Roelen, S Piric, RJD Boer
International Journal of Aviation Management 4 (3), 224-245, 2019
322019
Restorative just culture: a study of the practical and economic effects of implementing restorative justice in an NHS trust
M Kaur, RJ De Boer, A Oates, J Rafferty, S Dekker
MATEC Web of Conferences 273, 01007, 2019
322019
Automation surprise
RJ de Boer, K Hurts
Aviation psychology and applied human factors, 2017
28*2017
The integration of drones in today's society
M Pappot, RJ de Boer
Procedia Engineering 128, 54-63, 2015
282015
The importance of risk management: what is missing in ISO standards?
SH Björnsdóttir, P Jensson, RJ de Boer, SE Thorsteinsson
Risk Analysis 42 (4), 659-691, 2022
252022
How did crew resource management take-off outside of the cockpit? A systematic review of how crew resource management training is conceptualised and evaluated for non-pilots
J Havinga, RJ De Boer, A Rae, SWA Dekker
Safety 3 (4), 26, 2017
232017
Exploring the diversity in safety measurement practices: Empirical results from aviation
S Kaspers, N Karanikas, A Roelen, S Piric, R van Aalst, RJ De Boer
Journal of Safety Studies 2 (2), 18-29, 2016
202016
When to STAMP? A case study in aircraft ground handling services
D Passenier, A Sharpanskykh, RJ de Boer
Procedia Engineering 128, 35-43, 2015
202015
Measuring safety in aviation: Empirical results about the relation between safety outcomes and safety management system processes, operational activities and demographic data
S Kaspers, N Karanikas, S Piric, R van Aalst, RJ de Boer, A Roelen
The Seventh International Conference on Performance, Safety and Robustness …, 2017
182017
The duration of automation bias in a realistic setting
RJ de Boer, W Heems, K Hurts
The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 24 (4), 287-299, 2014
172014
Seneca’s error: An affective model of cognitive resistance
RJ De Boer
162012
The automatic identification of unstable approaches from flight data
RJ de Boer, T Coumou, A Hunink, T van Bennekom
6th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, ICRAT, 26-30, 2014
122014
Data mining in MRO
M Pelt, A Apostolidis, RJ de Boer, M Borst, J Broodbakker, R Jansen, ...
Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Faculteit Techniek, 2019
112019
Effectiveness of risk controls as indicator of safety performance
A Roelen, R van Aalst, N Karanikas, S Kaspers, S Piric, RJ de Boer
Aup advances 1 (1), 175-189, 2018
112018
Emotional alignment in teams: how emotions support the design process
RJ De Boer, P Badke-Schaub
DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, the 10th International Design Conference …, 2008
112008
Application of STAMP to facilitate interventions to improve platform safety
RJ de Boer, S de Jong
Proceedings of the 3rd STAMP workshop, boston, 2014
102014
Introduction of ramp-LOSA at KLM Ground Services
GJH RJ de Boer, B Koncak, R Habekotté
Human Factors of Systems and Technology, 139-146, 2012
10*2012
Goal conflicts, classical management and constructivism: How operators get things done
L Boskeljon-Horst, RJ De Boer, S Sillem, SWA Dekker
Safety 8 (2), 37, 2022
92022
Results from Surveys about Existing Aviation Safety Metrics
S Kaspers, N Karanikas, A Roelen, S Piric, R van Aalst, RJ de Boer
92016
Het systeem kan de bewerking nu niet uitvoeren. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Artikelen 1–20